| Economics
News Articles: December 2002 / January 2003 |
Welcome to this combined December
and January set of news articles. I have combined the two months to take
account of the fact that most of you will have been having a break from
your studies - and it gives me a break too!
There have been several notable
events in the news these past two months that are relevant to a principles
of economics course. These include: continuing worries about the fragile
state of the world economy (see news item 10); the likely effects of a
war with Iraq (news item 2); the struggle of the supermarket giants and
others to take control of Safeway, the UK's fourth biggest supermarket
chain (news item 4); the announcement by the UK government in the 'Future
of Higher Education' White Paper that universities in England and Wales
will be able, from 2006, to increase the fees they charge from the current
£1100 to £3000, but that these fees will no longer be paid
'up-front' - instead, students will have to pay them back after they graduate
(news item 6); and the causes and effects of a record balance of trade
deficit for the UK (news item 19).
As always, I hope that you
find the articles useful for your studies and that they give you some insight
into the usefulness of economics in helping to explain the world around
us. Enjoy!
Two additional news links that you might find
useful are:
NewsDirectory.com
(links to newspapers worldwide)
Google News (allows you to search
over 4000 news sources by topic)
|
|
John Sloman
|
1.
End of the house price boom in sight?
2.
Effects of war fears on commodity prices
3.
Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy
4.
The battle for Safeway
5.
The great pay divide
6.
Funding higher education
7.
Business and sustainable development
8.
Are airfares too low?
9.
Competition policy and regulation: two recent cases
10.
The world economy: recovery or deepening recession?
11.
The state of London's economy
12.
Fiscal rules versus discretionary fiscal policy
13.
Should monetary policy be confined to inflation targeting?
14.
The relationship between property prices and consumer spending
15.
Economic growth and supply-side policy
16.
Free trade and Mexico's farmers
17.
The effects of EU enlargement
18.
Record UK balance of trade deficit
19.
Exchange rate volatility
20.
The IMF warns of the dangers of a single currency for west Africa
News
Item 1: End of the house price boom in sight?
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and 5th editions), Chapter 2 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapters 1, 2 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 4, 5 |
| |
| There are increasing signs that the
UK house price boom is beginning to slow. The following articles examine
the reasons and whether there will be a 'soft landing', with price increases
gently slowing, or whether there will be a sharp reversal, with prices
actually falling. The final article looks at the effects in certain parts
of the country, and particularly in previous housing 'hotspots'. |
House
prices ease as buyers wait and see Ananova (23/1/03)
Home buyers
put off by price fears BBC News Online (23/1/03)
Prices
'to fall 15% in housing hotspots' Independent (24/1/03)
| Questions |
| 1. |
What factors determine
the demand for houses? |
| 2. |
Why was there a decline
in 'buyer activity' in December? What role does speculation play here? |
| 3. |
For what reasons might
the housing market crash? Do any of these reasons exist at the moment? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 2: Effects of war fear on commodity prices
| Relevant to: |
Economics (4th
edition),
Chapters 2, 13, 14
Economics (5th
edition), Chapters 2, 13, 15 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapters 1, 2, 7, 12 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 4, 5, 25, 26 |
| |
| As the build-up of US and UK forces
in the Gulf continue and fears of a war with Iraq grow, so this has been
having effects on commodity prices. Two in particular are directly affected:
oil and gold. The following linked articles examine how and why. The third
article also looks at the longer-term economic costs of a war with Iraq. |
War
fears push oil to record high BBC News Online (21/1/03)
Saudi
says no oil shortage, price too high Forbes.com (25/1/03)
Calculating
the consequences The Economist (28/11/02)
Gold price
hits new six-year high BBC News Online (23/1/03)
| Questions |
| 1. |
Why have oil prices been
rising recently? What has determined the amount by which prices
have risen? |
| 2. |
For what reasons might
oil prices fall again? What would determine the amount by which prices
would fall in such circumstances? |
| 3. |
What reasons does Nordhaus
give (discussed in The Economist article) for arguing that the long-term
economic costs to the USA of a war with Iraq could be significantly greater
than most analysts predict? |
| 4. |
Why does a fall in the exchange rate of the dollar
relative to other currencies lead to a rise in the price of gold? What
determines the amount by which the price gold would rise in such circumstances? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 3: Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapter 3 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 2 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 19 |
| |
| On 22 January 2003, the EU Commission
endorsed proposals by Franz Fischler, the EU Agriculture Minister, to reform
the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The following article, from The
Economist of 23 January, looks at these proposals and at whether they
are likely to receive support from agriculture ministers from across the
EU and at whether they will be enough to appease other countries in the
WTO talks initiated in Doha (Qatar) in November 2001. |
Scything
farm subsidies
| Questions |
| 1. |
What the main criticisms
of the current EU system of setting minimum prices above the market equilibrium
from the perspective of (a) EU consumers; (b) the environment; (c) farmers
in developing countries? |
| 2. |
Why does the prospect
of 10 additional countries joining the EU in the middle of next year make
reform of the CAP urgent? |
| 3. |
What are the main features
of the proposed reforms and what effects would they be likely to have on
(a) EU farm production; (b) EU agricultural prices; (c) the rural environment
in the EU? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 4: The battle for Safeway
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 7, 8, 9, 12 (section
3) |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapters 4, 5, 6 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 12, 14, 17, 20 |
| |
| On 9 January 2003, Bradford-based
supermarket chain Wm Morrison (with 6 per cent of the market) announced
a takeover bid for Safeway, the UK's fourth largest supermarket chain (with
10 per cent of the market). Since then, there have been several other bids
from, amongst others, the three largest chains - Tesco, J Sainsbury and
Asda (owned by Wal-Mart). But what will be the effects for customers and
employees, and what will be the response of the competition authorities?
The following articles, from BBC Online and the Guardian
and the Observer, examine the issues. The final article, from Time
Magazine, looks at Wal-Mart and what it can do to cut costs if it wishes
to increase market share both inside and outside the USA. |
Tesco
joins battle for Safeway BBC News Online (22/1/03)
Safeway bidding:
Off the trolley? BBC News Online (22/1/03)
Guardian
Special on supermarkets: links to articles Guardian
Queue
now for the hot potato Guardian (16/1/03)
We
just can't keep out of supermarkets Observer (19/1/03)
Store
wars: who will be the casualties? Guardian (25/1/03)
Can
Wal-Mart Get Any Bigger? Time Magazine (5/1/03)
| Questions |
| 1. |
What benefit would a takeover
of Safeway bring for a successful bidder? |
| 2. |
How are Safeway staff
likely to be affected by a takeover? To what extent will this depend on
which company is successful in acquiring Safeway? |
| 3. |
What issues will the competition
authorities (the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission,
if the bid is referred to them by the OFT) address in deciding which, if
any, of the bids should be allowed to succeed? |
| 4. |
What can Wal-Mart do to increase its market share
in the USA and beyond? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 5: The great pay divide
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 9, 10 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 5 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 17 |
| |
| Latest evidence shows that pay inequality
has widened in the UK, between both high and low paid, and men and women.
The following articles look at the details and offer some explanations. |
The
great pay divide BBC News Online (26/11/02)
Women losing
gender pay battle BBC News Online (26/1/03)
Mean
Britain Guardian (17/1/03)
Gender
pay gap widens for the first time in 20 years The Scotsman (22/1/03)
| Questions |
| 1. |
What reasons can you suggest
for the widening of the 'yawning gulf' in pay between executives at Britain's
top companies and those at the bottom of the income scale? To what extent
could this growing gap be explained by (a) marginal productivity differences;
(b) the exploitation of market power in the labour market? |
| 2. |
Why has the gender pay
gap increased? |
| 3. |
Does increasing wages
of low-paid workers necessarily lead to a reduction in employment? Explain. |
| 4. |
Are tax credits a more effective way of helping
poor families than increases in the minimum wage? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 6: Funding higher education
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapter 11 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 6 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 19, 21 |
| |
On 22 January 2003, the UK government
published its White Paper, The Future of Higher Education. Amongst
other things, this gives details of the way higher education will be funded
and changes to the system of fees. Universities will be able to increase
fees up to £3000 per year from 2006, but students will no longer
have to pay fees up-front. In effect, students will be given a loan for
their fees. When they graduate, they will pay 9 per cent of their annual
income over £15,000 until the loan is paid off.
The White Paper also gives
details of increased funding and new incentives for universities to improve
the quantity and quality of research and to improve the quality of teaching.
The first of the following
links takes you to the Department for Education and Skills website, where
you will find links to the White Paper, an executive summary, a press notice
and a government explanation of what the changes will mean to students
and their parents. The remaining links take you to various press articles
discussing aspects of the White Paper. In the questions that follow, we
will focus on the new system of fees. |
Links
to White Paper, etc.
Q&A:
university tuition fees Times Online (23/1/03)
Earning
curve Times Online (23/1/03)
Forty
universities lead the dash for more cash in 2006 Times Online
(23/1/03)
Guardian
links to articles on tuition fees
'Terrific',
says man who devised fees scheme Guardian (22/1/03)
Lecturers
join attack on top-up fees Guardian (22/1/03)
Was
your degree worth £21k? Guardian (22/1/03)
| Questions |
| 1. |
In what ways will future
students (a) gain; (b) lose from the proposals in the White Paper? |
| 2. |
Would it be a good idea
to charge more for degrees (such as Economics degrees) where graduates
can expect to earn large salaries? |
| 3. |
Will the new system make
it easier or harder for the government to meet its target of raising the
proportion of the UK population between 18 and 30 studying in higher education
from the current 42% to 50% by 2010? |
| 4. |
Assess the proposals on fees on grounds of (a)
social efficiency; (b) equity; (c) long-term economic growth. |
Go back to contents
News
Item 7: Business and sustainable development
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 8, 11, 12 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 6 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 13, 14, 21 |
| |
| How can firms be persuaded to adopt
more environmentally and socially responsible practices? This is the question
examined in the first two of the following articles from the Observer
of 24 November and 15 December 2002. The final article, from the Guardian
of 24 January 2003, shows how a major multinational corporation, Nestlé,
was forced to back down on its demands that Ethiopia pay it $6m compensation
for assets seized in the 1970s. Public outcry and consumer pressure threatened
Nestlé's commercial interests. |
Wanted:
Shareholders with a global conscience
Stop
passing the buck to business
Nestlé
u-turn on Ethiopia debt
| Questions |
| 1. |
What for reasons might
businesses adopt more environmentally friendly or socially responsible
practices? |
| 2. |
Discuss the relative effectiveness
of two government policy methods to get firms to adopt such practices. |
| 3. |
Critically assess current
UK government policies towards achieving sustainable development. |
Go back to contents
News
Item 8: Are airfares too low?
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 11, 12 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 6 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 21 |
| |
| On 29 November 2002, the Royal Commission
on Environmental Pollution published its report on the contribution of
aircraft to climate change. The report calls for a rise in airfares, especially
on short-haul flights, to encourage people to switch from planes to trains.
The first link below takes you to the report and the accompanying press
release. The other two articles consider the findings of the report. |
The Environmental
Effects of Civil Aircraft in Flight Royal Commission on Environmental
Pollution (29/11/02)
Trains 'should
replace planes' BBC News Online (29/11/02)
Climate
changing pollution from aircraft set to soar by 350% Friends
of the Earth (29/11/02)
| Questions |
| 1. |
How would you attempt
to establish a socially efficient number of flights? |
| 2. |
Why is the number of flights
at present likely to be greater than the social optimum? |
| 3. |
What determines the cross
price elasticity of demand for train journeys relative to plane journeys?
How might this change over time? |
| 4. |
Discuss the relative merits of alternative policies
for achieving the socially optimum number of flights. |
Go back to contents
News
Item 9: Competition policy and regulation: two recent cases
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapter 12 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 6 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 20 |
| |
In November 2002, US toy firm Hasbro
was fined £4.95m by the Office of Fair Trading for forcing distributors
to fix toy and game prices in the UK. This was the largest fine ever imposed
by the OFT. Then in January 2003, following a year-long investigation by
the Competition Commission, Oftel, the telecommunications regulator, told
the mobile phone companies that they must reduce the price of their calls.
The first link below is to
the OFT site and reports on the Hasbro case. The next link looks at the
case. The following five links look at the Oftel decision. The final link
looks at changes to competition legislation in the UK under the new Enterprise
Act, which will come into force later this year. |
OFT
fines Hasbro £4.95 million for price fixing for toys OFT
site (29/11/02)
Hasbro fined
for toy price fixing BBC News Online (29/11/02)
Mobile
charges could lessen UTV News (17/1/03)
Mobile phone
firms ordered to cut rates BBC News Online (22/1/03)
Vodafone
wants judicial review of prices ruling Independent (23/1/03)
Yes,
it's good to talk by mobile phone. But not that good... Independent
(23/1/03)
Cutting
the cost of calls Channel 4 News (22/1/03)
OFT
launches guide to Enterprise Act OFT site (8/11/02)
| Questions |
| 1. |
In what ways were Hasbro's
activities 'anti competitive'? What barriers to entry are there in the
markets in which Hasbro is operating that allowed a lack of competition
to continue? |
| 2. |
What was the value of
'X' in the RPI - X formula that Oftel wished to impose before the proposal
was referred to the Competition Commission. What incentives would this
have imposed on the mobile phone operators? |
| 3. |
Comment on the response
by the mobile phone operators to the Competition Commission report. |
| 4. |
What are the main features of the Enterprise
Act? Will they make competition legislation in the UK more effective? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 10: The world economy: recovery or deepening recession?
| Relevant to: |
Economics (4th
edition),
Chapters 13, 16, 17
Economics (5th
edition), Chapters 13, 17, 20 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 7, 8 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 25, 29 |
| |
| With the recovery in many economies
of the world remaining fragile, with others, such as Japan, sliding further
into recession, and with continuing worries about war with Iraq, commentators
are generally pessimistic about significant world recovery in the near
future. Politicians attempt to 'talk up markets' and boost confidence by
being optimistic, but businesses around the world seem to not be convinced
by such optimism. Meanwhile, relatively buoyant consumer spending seems
to be preventing a fall into deep recession. But will this confidence continue
indefinitely, or will worries expressed by business start affecting consumer
sentiment? The following linked articles explore the issues. The last one
looks at recent confidence indicators in the EU; you can download the latest
month's indicators from this link. |
U.S.
economy gains 4% in third quarter Toronto Star (21/12/02)
Brown warns
on the economy BBC News Online (27/11/02)
World's
economy not expected to improve for months Taipei Times, Taiwan
(21/12/03)
CBI forecasts
42,000 job losses BBC News Online (23/1/03)
U.K.
Retail Sales Rise 1.1% Bloomberg (23/1/03)
ECB
Says Recovery in 2003 `Remains Main Scenario' Bloomberg (23/1/03)
Economic
gloom at Davos forum BBC News Online (23/1/03)
Confidence
indicators in the EU The EU Directorate General for Economic and
Financial Affairs
| Questions |
| 1. |
What factors will determine
whether the world economy grows or declines over the coming months? |
| 2. |
Why has business investment
fallen substantially in many countries, while consumer demand has remained
relatively buoyant? To what extent can the accelerator theory explain this? |
| 3. |
Why would a continuing
recession in the eurozone or the UK cause a conflict between meeting fiscal
targets and the use of fiscal policy to cure the recession? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 11: The state of London's economy
| Relevant to: |
Economics (4th
edition),
Chapters 13, 16, 18, 22
Economics (5th
edition), Chapters 13, 17, 18, 22 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapters 7 - 10 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 25, 27, 29, 30 |
| |
| The economy of London seems to be
faring worse than most of the rest of the UK. The following article, from
The
Economist of 9 January 2003, examines the causes of this 'metropolitan
gloom' and looks at its implications for the UK economy as a whole. |
Metropolitan
gloom
| Questions |
| 1. |
What evidence is there
that London is in, or heading for, recession? |
| 2. |
Why does the London economy
tend to be more volatile than most other parts of the UK? |
| 3. |
How is the rest of the
UK economy likely to be affected by a recession in London? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 12: Fiscal rules versus discretionary fiscal policy
| Relevant to: |
Economics (4th
edition),
Chapters 16, 17
Economics (5th
edition), Chapters 17, 20 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 8 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 29 |
| |
| With several economies round the world
verging on recession, calls are being made by many economists and politicians
for governments to give their economies a fiscal boost. As the second article
below shows, the USA administration has recently done just that. But many
countries have set themselves fiscal rules which require them to keep budget
deficits within limits. In the UK there is the 'Golden Rule'. In the EU,
there is the Growth and Stability Pact. The problem is that a combination
of recession and expansionary fiscal policy means that the budget deficit
limits are being breached. Is it time to amend the rules, or time to tighten
budgets? |
EU
set to reform budget rules BBC News Online (27/11/02)
Bush
announces £420bn economic boost Ananova (7/1/03)
Warning
for Chancellor as public debt rises Ananova (21/1/03)
| Questions |
| 1. |
Explain the conflict between
using fiscal policy to bring an economy out of recession and the adherence
to fiscal rules. |
| 2. |
What is the case for sticking
to fiscal rules in such circumstances? |
| 3. |
What are the benefits
and dangers of relaxing fiscal rules? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 13: Should monetary policy be confined to inflation targeting?
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 18 - 20 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 8 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 29 |
| |
| "A decade ago, when many central banks
first set inflation targets, monetary policy looked clear-cut: the best
way to deliver economic and financial stability was to keep the rate of
consumer-price inflation low and stable. Yet experience has shown that
price stability does not guarantee financial stability." So begins the
linked article, from The Economist of 16 January 2003. The article
reassesses the role of monetary policy and considers suggestions that it
ought to take specific account of asset prices (e.g. share and property
prices). |
Still
bubbling
| Questions |
| 1. |
What is the case for using
monetary policy to prevent asset price 'bubbles'? |
| 2. |
Why do some central bankers
reject these arguments? Are they justified in rejecting them? |
| 3. |
How can a framework of
inflation targeting "cope with the policy dilemmas about asset prices"?
Why might short-run deviations from inflation targets be desirable? |
| 4. |
Why might the taking into account of asset prices
when framing monetary policy lead to money supply growth targets being
used alongside inflation targets (as already happens in the eurozone)? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 14: The relationship between property prices and consumer spending
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 16 - 20 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 8 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 29 |
| |
| Despite share prices falling for more
than three years, with a consequent fall in the wealth of shareholders,
consumer spending has been rising at more than 3 per cent a year in the
USA, the UK and Australia. The explanation for this lies partly in rising
house prices. The following article, from The Economist of 9 January
2003, looks at why rising house prices have helped to encourage an increase
in consumer spending. It also looks at some of the longer-term consequences. |
Living
in never-never land
| Questions |
| 1. |
Why has consumer spending
gone on increasing despite falling share prices? |
| 2. |
Does it matter if average
real debt as a proportion of income has increased? |
| 3. |
Why is the rate of equity
withdrawal (i.e. people borrowing more based on the increased value of
their property) likely to slow down? What would be the implication of this
for consumer spending? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 15: Economic growth and supply-side policy
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 21, 22 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 10 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 30 |
| |
| The focus of macroeconomic policy-making
at the moment is on how to avoid recession and achieve a return to sustained
economic growth. But in the longer term, the rate of economic growth that
can be sustained depends on the supply side of the economy: i.e. on the
growth in potential output. The following two articles examine the
importance of supply-side policies. The first, taken from BusinessWeek
Online of 24 January 2003, looks at the policy recommendations of Nobel
Prize winner, Robert Lucas (see Box 21.4 in Economics). The second
looks at the recommendations for the UK economy of Michael Porter of Harvard
Business School. This is taken from BBC NewsOnline of 22 January
2003. |
The
Dawn of a Supply-Side Century?
UK told to
improve roads and skills
| Questions |
| 1. |
Is it reasonable to claim
that the business cycle has been effectively tamed by fiscal and monetary
policy? |
| 2. |
What policy measures could
a government adopt to improve the rate of growth in potential output? |
| 3. |
What specific measures
should be adopted in the UK to improve the supply side of the economy? |
| 4. |
Are there any drawbacks in focusing on increasing
the rate of growth in potential output? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 16: Free trade and Mexico's farmers
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapter 23 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 11 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 22, 24 |
| |
| At the beginning of this year, NAFTA
(the North American Free-Trade Agreement) introduced a new set of scheduled
tariff reductions on agricultural products. This means that Mexico has
now eliminated tariffs on many items, such as wheat, rice and potatoes.
By 2008, all tariffs on agricultural imports into Mexico from the USA and
Canada will have been eliminated. This opening up of Mexican agriculture
to freer trade has been greeted with protests from Mexican farmers, who
see it as a major threat to their livelihoods. The first of the linked
articles, from the San Francisco Chronicle of 20 January 2003, looks
at the protests and the likely actions of the farmers. The second article
is from The Economist of 28 November 2002. It analyses the various
issues underlying the lifting of the tariffs. |
Mexican
farmers renew protests against NAFTA tariff openings
Mexico's
farmers: Floundering in a tariff-free landscape
| Questions |
| 1. |
In what ways would Mexicans
gain and lose from the complete elimination of tariffs and other trade
restrictions on food imports? |
| 2. |
What effects will the
recent tariff reductions have in practice? |
| 3. |
Why have Mexican agricultural
exports declined in recent years? |
| 4. |
From the evidence of The Economist article,
does Mexico have a comparative advantage in agricultural produce? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 17: The effects of EU enlargement
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 23, 25 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapters 11, 12 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 24, 31 |
| |
| To what extent will the accession
of 10 additional countries to the EU in 2004 benefit them? What will be
the effects on the existing 15 countries, and how will the new enlarged
EU cope with a greater diversity of members? These are some of the issues
examined in the following linked article from the Observer of 15
December 2002. |
East
is East and West is rich
| Questions |
| 1. |
What will the accession
countries gain from EU membership? |
| 2. |
What will be the costs
and benefits to the 15 existing members of this enlargement? |
| 3. |
Why will it be very difficult
to adopt and operate a consistent and fair regional policy after 2004? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 18: Record UK balance of trade deficit
| Relevant to: |
Economics (4th
edition),
Chapters 14, 24
Economics (5th
edition), Chapters 15, 24 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 12 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 26 |
| |
| The UK's balance of trade deficit
grew to a record level of £3.9 billion in November 2002, meaning
that the total trade deficit for 2002 is likely to be some £35 billion
(compared with £33.6 billion in 2001). This is the largest deficit
as a percentage of GDP (3.5%) since the late 1980s. Why has this happened
and does it matter? These are two of the questions examined in the following
linked articles. |
Trade
deficit at record £4bn Guardian (11/1/03)
Goods
trade deficit set to hit a record £35bn Scotsman (11/1/03)
British
trade gap soars to record £4bn Edinburgh Evening News
(10/1/03)
UK
trade gap yawns wider BusinessEurope.com (10/1/03)
| Questions |
| 1. |
Why has the trade deficit
risen? Are any of the reasons to be found in the domestic economy? |
| 2. |
Would a reduction in the
trade deficit be achieved by a change in interest rates, and, if so, how? |
| 3. |
What is meant by the term
"erratics", when applied to the balance of payments account? What erratics
were contributing to the balance of trade deficit? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 19: Exchange rate volatility
| Relevant to: |
Economics (4th
edition),
Chapters 14, 24
Economics (5th
edition), Chapters 15, 24 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 12 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapters 26, 31 |
| |
| In recent months the euro has been
appreciating markedly against the US dollar. This is symptomatic of the
volatility of exchange rates that has been experienced in recent years
between the major currencies (the dollar, euro, yen and pound). In January
1999, the $/€ rate was $1.16. The euro then fell to $0.85 by October
2000 (a 27% depreciation). By late January 2003 the rate had risen to $1.07.
What causes these swings and do they matter? The following articles look
at some of the issues. The first is from BBC NewsOnline of 22 January
2003. The second is from BusinessWeek Online of 23 January
2003. |
Euro
strength worries bankers
Currency
Whiplash Ahead?
| Questions |
| 1. |
What are the costs and
benefits to the eurozone countries of a high exchange rate of the euro
with respect to the US dollar? What implications would a higher exchange
rate have for interest rates in the eurozone? Why? |
| 2. |
Why do volatile and unpredictable
exchange rates pose serious problems for business and economies generally? |
| 3. |
What policy measures can
governments take, either on their own or jointly with each other, to reduce
exchange rate fluctuations? |
Go back to contents
News
Item 20: The IMF warns of the dangers of a single currency for west Africa
| Relevant to: |
| Economics (4th
and
5th editions), Chapters 23, 25 |
| Essentials of Economics
(2nd edition), Chapter 12 |
| Economics for Business
(2nd edition), Chapter 31 |
| |
| Several west African countries are
proposing to form an economic and monetary union with a single currency
in July 2005. But a recent IMF working paper warns that a single currency
for the region could make several of the member countries worse off. Despite
this, the West African Monetary Institute has claimed that the member states
are determined to go ahead with the single currency as planned. The following
articles look at the arguments. The final link is to the IMF working paper
(you will probably find most of this too advanced, but the stylized facts
section on pages 9-14 is quite accessible). |
The
Proposed Monetary Union The Independent, Banjul (20/12/03)
Bamanga Disagrees
With IMF Over Regional Currency Daily Trust, Abuja (16/1/03)
IMF Warns
Against Single Currency This Day, Lagos (16/1/03)
Blackmail
Won't Stop Single Currency, Nigeria tells IMF This Day, Lagos
(17/1/03)
Western African
Monetary Union to Go Ahead On Single Currency Ghanaian Chronicle
(20/1/03)
West Africa
ignores IMF red flag BBC NewsOnline (22/1/03)
Monetary
Union in West Africa: Who Might Gain, Who Might Lose, and Why? IMF
Working Paper, 02/226
| Questions |
| 1. |
What are the potential
benefits to the participating countries of a single west African currency? |
| 2. |
What are the arguments
used by the IMF to suggest that a single currency could harm the economies
of member states? |
| 3. |
What policies would Nigeria
have to adopt, according to the IMF, if the remaining countries were to
gain from Nigeria's membership of the single currency? |
Go back to contents