Economics News Articles: December 2002 / January 2003

 
Welcome to this combined December and January set of news articles. I have combined the two months to take account of the fact that most of you will have been having a break from your studies - and it gives me a break too!
    There have been several notable events in the news these past two months that are relevant to a principles of economics course. These include: continuing worries about the fragile state of the world economy (see news item 10); the likely effects of a war with Iraq (news item 2); the struggle of the supermarket giants and others to take control of Safeway, the UK's fourth biggest supermarket chain (news item 4); the announcement by the UK government in the 'Future of Higher Education' White Paper that universities in England and Wales will be able, from 2006, to increase the fees they charge from the current £1100 to £3000, but that these fees will no longer be paid 'up-front' - instead, students will have to pay them back after they graduate (news item 6); and the causes and effects of a record balance of trade deficit for the UK (news item 19).
    As always, I hope that you find the articles useful for your studies and that they give you some insight into the usefulness of economics in helping to explain the world around us. Enjoy!

Two additional news links that you might find useful are:

NewsDirectory.com (links to newspapers worldwide)
Google News (allows you to search over 4000 news sources by topic)
John Sloman

 Contents 
1. End of the house price boom in sight?
2. Effects of war fears on commodity prices
3. Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy
4. The battle for Safeway
5. The great pay divide
6. Funding higher education
7. Business and sustainable development
8. Are airfares too low?
9. Competition policy and regulation: two recent cases
10. The world economy: recovery or deepening recession?
11. The state of London's economy
12. Fiscal rules versus discretionary fiscal policy
13. Should monetary policy be confined to inflation targeting?
14. The relationship between property prices and consumer spending
15. Economic growth and supply-side policy
16. Free trade and Mexico's farmers
17. The effects of EU enlargement
18. Record UK balance of trade deficit
19. Exchange rate volatility
20. The IMF warns of the dangers of a single currency for west Africa

News Item 1: End of the house price boom in sight?


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapter 2
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapters 1, 2
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 4, 5
 
There are increasing signs that the UK house price boom is beginning to slow. The following articles examine the reasons and whether there will be a 'soft landing', with price increases gently slowing, or whether there will be a sharp reversal, with prices actually falling. The final article looks at the effects in certain parts of the country, and particularly in previous housing 'hotspots'.
House prices ease as buyers wait and see Ananova (23/1/03)
Home buyers put off by price fears BBC News Online (23/1/03)
Prices 'to fall 15% in housing hotspots' Independent (24/1/03)
Questions
1. What factors determine the demand for houses?
2. Why was there a decline in 'buyer activity' in December? What role does speculation play here?
3. For what reasons might the housing market crash? Do any of these reasons exist at the moment?

Go back to contents


News Item 2: Effects of war fear on commodity prices


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th edition), Chapters 2, 13, 14
    Economics (5th edition), Chapters 2, 13, 15
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapters 1, 2, 7, 12
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 4, 5, 25, 26
 
As the build-up of US and UK forces in the Gulf continue and fears of a war with Iraq grow, so this has been having effects on commodity prices. Two in particular are directly affected: oil and gold. The following linked articles examine how and why. The third article also looks at the longer-term economic costs of a war with Iraq.
War fears push oil to record high BBC News Online (21/1/03)
Saudi says no oil shortage, price too high Forbes.com (25/1/03)
Calculating the consequences The Economist (28/11/02)
Gold price hits new six-year high BBC News Online (23/1/03)
Questions
1. Why have oil prices been rising recently? What has determined the amount by which prices have risen?
2. For what reasons might oil prices fall again? What would determine the amount by which prices would fall in such circumstances?
3. What reasons does Nordhaus give (discussed in The Economist article) for arguing that the long-term economic costs to the USA of a war with Iraq could be significantly greater than most analysts predict?
4. Why does a fall in the exchange rate of the dollar relative to other currencies lead to a rise in the price of gold? What determines the amount by which the price gold would rise in such circumstances?

Go back to contents


News Item 3: Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapter 3
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 2
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 19
 
On 22 January 2003, the EU Commission endorsed proposals by Franz Fischler, the EU Agriculture Minister, to reform the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The following article, from The Economist of 23 January, looks at these proposals and at whether they are likely to receive support from agriculture ministers from across the EU and at whether they will be enough to appease other countries in the WTO talks initiated in Doha (Qatar) in November 2001.
Scything farm subsidies
Questions
1. What the main criticisms of the current EU system of setting minimum prices above the market equilibrium from the perspective of (a) EU consumers; (b) the environment; (c) farmers in developing countries?
2. Why does the prospect of 10 additional countries joining the EU in the middle of next year make reform of the CAP urgent?
3. What are the main features of the proposed reforms and what effects would they be likely to have on (a) EU farm production; (b) EU agricultural prices; (c) the rural environment in the EU?

Go back to contents


News Item 4: The battle for Safeway


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 7, 8, 9, 12 (section 3)
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapters 4, 5, 6
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 12, 14, 17, 20
 
On 9 January 2003, Bradford-based supermarket chain Wm Morrison (with 6 per cent of the market) announced a takeover bid for Safeway, the UK's fourth largest supermarket chain (with 10 per cent of the market). Since then, there have been several other bids from, amongst others, the three largest chains - Tesco, J Sainsbury and Asda (owned by Wal-Mart). But what will be the effects for customers and employees, and what will be the response of the competition authorities? The following articles, from BBC Online and the Guardian and the Observer, examine the issues. The final article, from Time Magazine, looks at Wal-Mart and what it can do to cut costs if it wishes to increase market share both inside and outside the USA.
Tesco joins battle for Safeway BBC News Online (22/1/03)
Safeway bidding: Off the trolley? BBC News Online (22/1/03)
Guardian Special on supermarkets: links to articles Guardian
Queue now for the hot potato Guardian (16/1/03)
We just can't keep out of supermarkets Observer (19/1/03)
Store wars: who will be the casualties? Guardian (25/1/03)
Can Wal-Mart Get Any Bigger? Time Magazine (5/1/03)
Questions
1. What benefit would a takeover of Safeway bring for a successful bidder?
2. How are Safeway staff likely to be affected by a takeover? To what extent will this depend on which company is successful in acquiring Safeway?
3. What issues will the competition authorities (the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission, if the bid is referred to them by the OFT) address in deciding which, if any, of the bids should be allowed to succeed?
4. What can Wal-Mart do to increase its market share in the USA and beyond?

Go back to contents


News Item 5: The great pay divide


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 9, 10
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 5
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 17
 
Latest evidence shows that pay inequality has widened in the UK, between both high and low paid, and men and women. The following articles look at the details and offer some explanations.
The great pay divide BBC News Online (26/11/02)
Women losing gender pay battle BBC News Online (26/1/03)
Mean Britain Guardian (17/1/03)
Gender pay gap widens for the first time in 20 years The Scotsman (22/1/03)
Questions
1. What reasons can you suggest for the widening of the 'yawning gulf' in pay between executives at Britain's top companies and those at the bottom of the income scale? To what extent could this growing gap be explained by (a) marginal productivity differences; (b) the exploitation of market power in the labour market?
2. Why has the gender pay gap increased?
3. Does increasing wages of low-paid workers necessarily lead to a reduction in employment? Explain.
4. Are tax credits a more effective way of helping poor families than increases in the minimum wage?

Go back to contents


News Item 6: Funding higher education


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapter 11
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 6
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 19, 21
 
On 22 January 2003, the UK government published its White Paper, The Future of Higher Education. Amongst other things, this gives details of the way higher education will be funded and changes to the system of fees. Universities will be able to increase fees up to £3000 per year from 2006, but students will no longer have to pay fees up-front. In effect, students will be given a loan for their fees. When they graduate, they will pay 9 per cent of their annual income over £15,000 until the loan is paid off.
    The White Paper also gives details of increased funding and new incentives for universities to improve the quantity and quality of research and to improve the quality of teaching.
    The first of the following links takes you to the Department for Education and Skills website, where you will find links to the White Paper, an executive summary, a press notice and a government explanation of what the changes will mean to students and their parents. The remaining links take you to various press articles discussing aspects of the White Paper. In the questions that follow, we will focus on the new system of fees.
Links to White Paper, etc.
Q&A: university tuition fees Times Online (23/1/03)
Earning curve Times Online (23/1/03)
Forty universities lead the dash for more cash in 2006 Times Online (23/1/03)
Guardian links to articles on tuition fees
'Terrific', says man who devised fees scheme Guardian (22/1/03)
Lecturers join attack on top-up fees Guardian (22/1/03)
Was your degree worth £21k? Guardian (22/1/03)
Questions
1. In what ways will future students (a) gain; (b) lose from the proposals in the White Paper?
2. Would it be a good idea to charge more for degrees (such as Economics degrees) where graduates can expect to earn large salaries?
3. Will the new system make it easier or harder for the government to meet its target of raising the proportion of the UK population between 18 and 30 studying in higher education from the current 42% to 50% by 2010?
4. Assess the proposals on fees on grounds of (a) social efficiency; (b) equity; (c) long-term economic growth.

Go back to contents


News Item 7: Business and sustainable development


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 8, 11, 12
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 6
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 13, 14, 21
 
How can firms be persuaded to adopt more environmentally and socially responsible practices? This is the question examined in the first two of the following articles from the Observer of 24 November and 15 December 2002. The final article, from the Guardian of 24 January 2003, shows how a major multinational corporation, Nestlé, was forced to back down on its demands that Ethiopia pay it $6m compensation for assets seized in the 1970s. Public outcry and consumer pressure threatened Nestlé's commercial interests.
Wanted: Shareholders with a global conscience
Stop passing the buck to business
Nestlé u-turn on Ethiopia debt
Questions
1. What for reasons might businesses adopt more environmentally friendly or socially responsible practices?
2. Discuss the relative effectiveness of two government policy methods to get firms to adopt such practices.
3. Critically assess current UK government policies towards achieving sustainable development.

Go back to contents


News Item 8: Are airfares too low?


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 11, 12
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 6
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 21
 
On 29 November 2002, the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution published its report on the contribution of aircraft to climate change. The report calls for a rise in airfares, especially on short-haul flights, to encourage people to switch from planes to trains. The first link below takes you to the report and the accompanying press release. The other two articles consider the findings of the report.
The Environmental Effects of Civil Aircraft in Flight Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (29/11/02)
Trains 'should replace planes' BBC News Online (29/11/02)
Climate changing pollution from aircraft set to soar by 350%  Friends of the Earth (29/11/02)
Questions
1. How would you attempt to establish a socially efficient number of flights?
2. Why is the number of flights at present likely to be greater than the social optimum?
3. What determines the cross price elasticity of demand for train journeys relative to plane journeys? How might this change over time?
4. Discuss the relative merits of alternative policies for achieving the socially optimum number of flights.

Go back to contents


News Item 9: Competition policy and regulation: two recent cases


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapter 12
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 6
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 20
 
In November 2002, US toy firm Hasbro was fined £4.95m by the Office of Fair Trading for forcing distributors to fix toy and game prices in the UK. This was the largest fine ever imposed by the OFT. Then in January 2003, following a year-long investigation by the Competition Commission, Oftel, the telecommunications regulator, told the mobile phone companies that they must reduce the price of their calls.
    The first link below is to the OFT site and reports on the Hasbro case. The next link looks at the case. The following five links look at the Oftel decision. The final link looks at changes to competition legislation in the UK under the new Enterprise Act, which will come into force later this year.
OFT fines Hasbro £4.95 million for price fixing for toys  OFT site (29/11/02)
Hasbro fined for toy price fixing BBC News Online (29/11/02)
Mobile charges could lessen UTV News (17/1/03)
Mobile phone firms ordered to cut rates BBC News Online (22/1/03)
Vodafone wants judicial review of prices ruling Independent (23/1/03)
Yes, it's good to talk by mobile phone. But not that good... Independent (23/1/03)
Cutting the cost of calls Channel 4 News (22/1/03)
OFT launches guide to Enterprise Act OFT site (8/11/02)
Questions
1. In what ways were Hasbro's activities 'anti competitive'? What barriers to entry are there in the markets in which Hasbro is operating that allowed a lack of competition to continue?
2. What was the value of 'X' in the RPI - X formula that Oftel wished to impose before the proposal was referred to the Competition Commission. What incentives would this have imposed on the mobile phone operators?
3. Comment on the response by the mobile phone operators to the Competition Commission report.
4. What are the main features of the Enterprise Act? Will they make competition legislation in the UK more effective?

Go back to contents


News Item 10: The world economy: recovery or deepening recession?


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th edition), Chapters 13, 16, 17
    Economics (5th edition), Chapters 13, 17, 20
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 7, 8
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 25, 29
 
With the recovery in many economies of the world remaining fragile, with others, such as Japan, sliding further into recession, and with continuing worries about war with Iraq, commentators are generally pessimistic about significant world recovery in the near future. Politicians attempt to 'talk up markets' and boost confidence by being optimistic, but businesses around the world seem to not be convinced by such optimism. Meanwhile, relatively buoyant consumer spending seems to be preventing a fall into deep recession. But will this confidence continue indefinitely, or will worries expressed by business start affecting consumer sentiment? The following linked articles explore the issues. The last one looks at recent confidence indicators in the EU; you can download the latest month's indicators from this link.
U.S. economy gains 4% in third quarter Toronto Star (21/12/02)
Brown warns on the economy BBC News Online (27/11/02)
World's economy not expected to improve for months Taipei Times, Taiwan (21/12/03)
CBI forecasts 42,000 job losses BBC News Online (23/1/03)
U.K. Retail Sales Rise 1.1% Bloomberg (23/1/03)
ECB Says Recovery in 2003 `Remains Main Scenario' Bloomberg (23/1/03)
Economic gloom at Davos forum BBC News Online (23/1/03)
Confidence indicators in the EU The EU Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs
Questions
1. What factors will determine whether the world economy grows or declines over the coming months?
2. Why has business investment fallen substantially in many countries, while consumer demand has remained relatively buoyant? To what extent can the accelerator theory explain this?
3. Why would a continuing recession in the eurozone or the UK cause a conflict between meeting fiscal targets and the use of fiscal policy to cure the recession?

Go back to contents


News Item 11: The state of London's economy


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th edition), Chapters 13, 16, 18, 22
    Economics (5th edition), Chapters 13, 17, 18, 22
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapters 7 - 10
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 25, 27, 29, 30
 
The economy of London seems to be faring worse than most of the rest of the UK. The following article, from The Economist of 9 January 2003, examines the causes of this 'metropolitan gloom' and looks at its implications for the UK economy as a whole.
Metropolitan gloom
Questions
1. What evidence is there that London is in, or heading for, recession?
2. Why does the London economy tend to be more volatile than most other parts of the UK?
3. How is the rest of the UK economy likely to be affected by a recession in London?

Go back to contents


News Item 12: Fiscal rules versus discretionary fiscal policy


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th edition), Chapters 16, 17
    Economics (5th edition), Chapters 17, 20
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 8
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 29
 
With several economies round the world verging on recession, calls are being made by many economists and politicians for governments to give their economies a fiscal boost. As the second article below shows, the USA administration has recently done just that. But many countries have set themselves fiscal rules which require them to keep budget deficits within limits. In the UK there is the 'Golden Rule'. In the EU, there is the Growth and Stability Pact. The problem is that a combination of recession and expansionary fiscal policy means that the budget deficit limits are being breached. Is it time to amend the rules, or time to tighten budgets?
EU set to reform budget rules BBC News Online (27/11/02)
Bush announces £420bn economic boost Ananova (7/1/03)
Warning for Chancellor as public debt rises Ananova (21/1/03)
Questions
1. Explain the conflict between using fiscal policy to bring an economy out of recession and the adherence to fiscal rules.
2. What is the case for sticking to fiscal rules in such circumstances?
3. What are the benefits and dangers of relaxing fiscal rules?

Go back to contents


News Item 13: Should monetary policy be confined to inflation targeting?


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 18 - 20
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 8
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 29
 
"A decade ago, when many central banks first set inflation targets, monetary policy looked clear-cut: the best way to deliver economic and financial stability was to keep the rate of consumer-price inflation low and stable. Yet experience has shown that price stability does not guarantee financial stability." So begins the linked article, from The Economist of 16 January 2003. The article reassesses the role of monetary policy and considers suggestions that it ought to take specific account of asset prices (e.g. share and property prices).
Still bubbling
Questions
1. What is the case for using monetary policy to prevent asset price 'bubbles'?
2. Why do some central bankers reject these arguments? Are they justified in rejecting them?
3. How can a framework of inflation targeting "cope with the policy dilemmas about asset prices"? Why might short-run deviations from inflation targets be desirable?
4. Why might the taking into account of asset prices when framing monetary policy lead to money supply growth targets being used alongside inflation targets (as already happens in the eurozone)?

Go back to contents


News Item 14: The relationship between property prices and consumer spending


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 16 - 20
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 8
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 29
 
Despite share prices falling for more than three years, with a consequent fall in the wealth of shareholders, consumer spending has been rising at more than 3 per cent a year in the USA, the UK and Australia. The explanation for this lies partly in rising house prices. The following article, from The Economist of 9 January 2003, looks at why rising house prices have helped to encourage an increase in consumer spending. It also looks at some of the longer-term consequences.
Living in never-never land
Questions
1. Why has consumer spending gone on increasing despite falling share prices?
2. Does it matter if average real debt as a proportion of income has increased?
3. Why is the rate of equity withdrawal (i.e. people borrowing more based on the increased value of their property) likely to slow down? What would be the implication of this for consumer spending?

Go back to contents


News Item 15: Economic growth and supply-side policy


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 21, 22
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 10
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 30
 
The focus of macroeconomic policy-making at the moment is on how to avoid recession and achieve a return to sustained economic growth. But in the longer term, the rate of economic growth that can be sustained depends on the supply side of the economy: i.e. on the growth in potential output. The following two articles examine the importance of supply-side policies. The first, taken from BusinessWeek Online of 24 January 2003, looks at the policy recommendations of Nobel Prize winner, Robert Lucas (see Box 21.4 in Economics). The second looks at the recommendations for the UK economy of Michael Porter of Harvard Business School.  This is taken from BBC NewsOnline of 22 January 2003.
The Dawn of a Supply-Side Century?
UK told to improve roads and skills
Questions
1. Is it reasonable to claim that the business cycle has been effectively tamed by fiscal and monetary policy?
2. What policy measures could a government adopt to improve the rate of growth in potential output?
3. What specific measures should be adopted in the UK to improve the supply side of the economy?
4. Are there any drawbacks in focusing on increasing the rate of growth in potential output?

Go back to contents


News Item 16: Free trade and Mexico's farmers


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapter 23
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 11
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 22, 24
 
At the beginning of this year, NAFTA (the North American Free-Trade Agreement) introduced a new set of scheduled tariff reductions on agricultural products. This means that Mexico has now eliminated tariffs on many items, such as wheat, rice and potatoes. By 2008, all tariffs on agricultural imports into Mexico from the USA and Canada will have been eliminated. This opening up of Mexican agriculture to freer trade has been greeted with protests from Mexican farmers, who see it as a major threat to their livelihoods. The first of the linked articles, from the San Francisco Chronicle of 20 January 2003, looks at the protests and the likely actions of the farmers. The second article is from The Economist of 28 November 2002. It analyses the various issues underlying the lifting of the tariffs.
Mexican farmers renew protests against NAFTA tariff openings
Mexico's farmers: Floundering in a tariff-free landscape
Questions
1. In what ways would Mexicans gain and lose from the complete elimination of tariffs and other trade restrictions on food imports?
2. What effects will the recent tariff reductions have in practice?
3. Why have Mexican agricultural exports declined in recent years?
4. From the evidence of The Economist article, does Mexico have a comparative advantage in agricultural produce?

Go back to contents


News Item 17: The effects of EU enlargement


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 23, 25
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapters 11, 12
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 24, 31
 
To what extent will the accession of 10 additional countries to the EU in 2004 benefit them? What will be the effects on the existing 15 countries, and how will the new enlarged EU cope with a greater diversity of members? These are some of the issues examined in the following linked article from the Observer of 15 December 2002.
East is East and West is rich
Questions
1. What will the accession countries gain from EU membership?
2. What will be the costs and benefits to the 15 existing members of this enlargement?
3. Why will it be very difficult to adopt and operate a consistent and fair regional policy after 2004?

Go back to contents


News Item 18: Record UK balance of trade deficit


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th edition), Chapters 14, 24
    Economics (5th edition), Chapters 15, 24
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 12
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 26
 
The UK's balance of trade deficit grew to a record level of £3.9 billion in November 2002, meaning that the total trade deficit for 2002 is likely to be some £35 billion (compared with £33.6 billion in 2001). This is the largest deficit as a percentage of GDP (3.5%) since the late 1980s. Why has this happened and does it matter? These are two of the questions examined in the following linked articles.
Trade deficit at record £4bn  Guardian (11/1/03)
Goods trade deficit set to hit a record £35bn Scotsman (11/1/03)
British trade gap soars to record £4bn Edinburgh Evening News (10/1/03)
UK trade gap yawns wider BusinessEurope.com (10/1/03)
Questions
1. Why has the trade deficit risen? Are any of the reasons to be found in the domestic economy?
2. Would a reduction in the trade deficit be achieved by a change in interest rates, and, if so, how?
3. What is meant by the term "erratics", when applied to the balance of payments account? What erratics were contributing to the balance of trade deficit?

Go back to contents


News Item 19: Exchange rate volatility


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th edition), Chapters 14, 24
    Economics (5th edition), Chapters 15, 24
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 12
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapters 26, 31
 
In recent months the euro has been appreciating markedly against the US dollar. This is symptomatic of the volatility of exchange rates that has been experienced in recent years between the major currencies (the dollar, euro, yen and pound). In January 1999, the $/€ rate was $1.16. The euro then fell to $0.85 by October 2000 (a 27% depreciation). By late January 2003 the rate had risen to $1.07. What causes these swings and do they matter? The following articles look at some of the issues. The first is from BBC NewsOnline of 22 January 2003. The second is from BusinessWeek Online of  23 January 2003. 
Euro strength worries bankers
Currency Whiplash Ahead?
Questions
1. What are the costs and benefits to the eurozone countries of a high exchange rate of the euro with respect to the US dollar? What implications would a higher exchange rate have for interest rates in the eurozone? Why?
2. Why do volatile and unpredictable exchange rates pose serious problems for business and economies generally?
3. What policy measures can governments take, either on their own or jointly with each other, to reduce exchange rate fluctuations?

Go back to contents


News Item 20: The IMF warns of the dangers of a single currency for west Africa


Relevant to:
    Economics (4th and 5th editions), Chapters 23, 25
    Essentials of Economics (2nd edition), Chapter 12
    Economics for Business (2nd edition), Chapter 31
 
Several west African countries are proposing to form an economic and monetary union with a single currency in July 2005. But a recent IMF working paper warns that a single currency for the region could make several of the member countries worse off. Despite this, the West African Monetary Institute has claimed that the member states are determined to go ahead with the single currency as planned. The following articles look at the arguments. The final link is to the IMF working paper (you will probably find most of this too advanced, but the stylized facts section on pages 9-14 is quite accessible).
The Proposed Monetary Union The Independent, Banjul (20/12/03)
Bamanga Disagrees With IMF Over Regional Currency Daily Trust, Abuja (16/1/03)
IMF Warns Against Single Currency This Day, Lagos (16/1/03)
Blackmail Won't Stop Single Currency, Nigeria tells IMF This Day, Lagos (17/1/03)
Western African Monetary Union to Go Ahead On Single Currency Ghanaian Chronicle (20/1/03)
West Africa ignores IMF red flag BBC NewsOnline (22/1/03)
Monetary Union in West Africa: Who Might Gain, Who Might Lose, and Why? IMF Working Paper, 02/226
Questions
1. What are the potential benefits to the participating countries of a single west African currency?
2. What are the arguments used by the IMF to suggest that a single currency could harm the economies of member states?
3. What policies would Nigeria have to adopt, according to the IMF, if the remaining countries were to gain from Nigeria's membership of the single currency?

Go back to contents